Tony Kushner in his play, Angels in America, hits on many justice
issues that, in that time period were very controversial. The play talks about religion, sexuality,
business, and family; in this post, I will be focusing on business. Specifically addressing the characters: Joe,
Roy, and Louis.
First, this
play has many queer qualities to it, not only because there are many homosexual
characters, but also because some characters are different and out of societal
norms. For example, Joe is a businessman
that has been offered a job in DC, however, when he comes out to his mentor, he
is told to restrain his feelings and live a “normal” life (act 4 scene 1). This scene not only shows that Joe is queer,
but it brings up the question, what is a “normal” life? In this play, a normal, non-queer, life is considered a man and a woman married
with children; the man has a job and the woman stays home with the kids. Roy, Joes mentor, believes that this is the
just way to live; but what is so just about it?
Just because it is the social norm, does not mean that having this life
style means you are living a just life. The
term justice means, “just behavior or treatment: a concern for justice, peace, and genuine respect for people”. If justice means having a genuine respect for
people, why is living a “queer” way unjust?
For Joe, I believe it is because he is a successful businessman and Roy
knows that the business word does not see the justice in someone being himself
or herself for happiness.
Since,
the term businessman is male generic language, most people assume that only men
are included. Although, Joe is male, being
a: homosexual, queer, man, leads to others to stereotype that he has a more feminine
communication; meaning, that he would be: less assertive, less dominant, less confident,
and more emotional (Wood, Julia T.). In 1985 when the
play takes place, most women did not work and this caused business to be male
dominated. If a male dominated society
let people with a different communication language in higher positions, then
the male dominated society would become, what they would consider, an
injustice. The irony of this is that Roy
was indeed a closeted queer, and was a big time lawyer in New York; this is
another reason why, Angels in America,
is queer. Even though he appeared to fit
the image of a normal lawyer, he actually was, by definition, queer.
Louis worked as a word processor
under Joe and Roy. For him, he was queer
because he was a homosexual. Although he
did work in the business world, he was the “lowest of the low”(28). In act one, scene six, Louis is crying over
the sink when Joe comes in and is surprised to find another man crying. This adds to the stereotype of gay men having
a more feminine communication style.
Louis tells Joe that the past three of his coworkers fled when they saw
him crying and Joe replied, “they just didn’t want to intrude” (29). This proves two things, that Louis has a
feminine communication style, Joe has a mixture of both feminine and masculine,
and Joe’s coworkers, who we assume are heterosexual, have a masculine
communication style. Since Louis in this
scene continues conversation and shares details about himself, one can assume
that the stereotype of a queer man having a feminine communication language is
correct (Wood, Julia T.). Joe on the other hand, sees
that Louis is upset and feels the need to console him, which is a women’s way
of interpreting nonverbal behavior. However,
he also uses minimal response cues such as, “well…” and “nothing”(29), which is
a form of masculine communication. Lastly,
even though we cannot be positive that the coworkers who ignored Louis were
heterosexual, to be less emotionally responsive is a factor in masculine
communication.
What I find most queer about the
business part of Angels in America is
that these queer businessmen are fighting for justice within their society. They all work for the government and to make
justice prevail. These characters, who are
restrained for their sexuality by what is considered just, are fighting for the
society’s idea of justice and against their sexuality. Joe and Roy are forced to hide themselves
from society to continue to succeed; Louis has accepted who he is and is proud
of it, but is held back from success. For
me, I do not see the justice in holding people back from their fullest self and
potential. However, I believe that these
characters understood the justice in their lives as a social norm that had to
be done; they knew that they had to choose either a career or their sexuality
because they did not know any different and for me, this produces a queer sense
of justice. Men, who I see being held
back from their full abilities, are fighting against themselves to make a
living instead of standing up and fighting for their justice.
Wood, Julia T. Gendered Lives. S.l.: Cengage Learning, 2016. Print.
I think your final line conveys what's most interesting about this post--that in different ways, all three of these men are held back, for reasons that have a lot to do with norms around sexuality and gender. Their internal (and sometimes very external) struggles illustrate important forms of queer injustice, if that makes sense. The choices they have to make, though, rather than illustrate a queer form of justice, seem to show us what was wrong (and to a certain extent still is) with the world. In a world that fostered a queer sense of justice, it seems to me that any man (or any person, really) would be able to identify in any number of ways with regard to their sexual orientation or gender identity and expression, without any negative consequence. Liberation from the norms that inhibit these characters' lives seems, by your reasoning, a key way to reach queer justice.
ReplyDelete